Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Learn from the small

Is innovation something only for the big players, with deep pockets and large R&D budgets? Or is it something a smaller company can also aspire? Nobody can dispute the fact that having a large R&D budget definitely helps. IBM, AT&T, the great innovating companies of the past century, have all invested billions of dollars in R&D. The pharma companies today do the same. The US Department of Defense, owner of the world’s largest budget, is also the world’s most significant R&D center.The famed ‘military-industrial’ complex of the US is no myth.Even the Internet came out of one such R&D project.

But, do small companies need to give up?

SMEs have their advantages too!

What are the forces that constrain innovation? A rogue’s gallery would line up something like this:

• Resistance from the established product or market regime. It was not for nothing that GM created a separate unit called Saturn to design and build its next generation car – it knew quite well that its existing status-quo- loving units could never do it. IBM resorted to a similar device to create its own PC. Obviously, the smaller you are, and the less successful you are, the less resistance you will have to deal with when you want to do something new!

• Bean counters know the cost of everything, and the value of nothing. Such corporate nay-sayers are much more common in big companies than in small ones!

• Too many layers between the ‘ideas person’ at the top (usually the founder/CEO) and the front line troops who have to execute the new idea. Again, won’t SMEs be much better off here? Strangely enough, it has been my experience that the CEO/founder is usually the one brimming with ideas – which is why he is the founder, after all. His/her problem usually is,people to take his/her ideas seriously! Anyone familiar with the way companies actually work would understand what I am saying – only the naïve think a CEO just has to issue orders, and the job gets done!

It almost looks like SMEs have an unfair advantage!

What is innovation, anyway?

One of the most innovative companies I have ever studied was a small company in Ahmedabad called Amtrex. While other companies were merely running management development courses on BPR, Amtrex was actually doing it redesigning its business processes, so a customer could get an air conditioner in 24 hours (In India, mind you!), reconfiguring its new product development process to cut the time from concept to market by more than half, and so on. Why was it able to do such things? Because a small group of people at the top dared to think it could be done, had nothing to lose by doing things differently, and in fact, realized that the company could only expect to survive by doing things differently.

After all, innovation can be in business processes, business models, too.

The best recent case is of Twitter. The founder, Evan Williams, worked at Google, supposedly the most innovative large company in the world, and found the processes there, far too stultifying to come up with anything new. He realized very early that most new ideas cannot be easily understood by anyone other than their creator, and that they happen mostly by accident, not by design or management process. Though Google consciously builds management processes to encourage innovation, it wasn’t enough for Mr. Williams.

Listening to the unvoiced voice of the non-customer!

Finally, where do the most innovative ideas come from? From the market, yes, but not necessarily the one we mean. Blue Ocean ideas come from listening to non-customers, not to customers. Southwest Airlines, to quote an obvious example, could never have come up with its innovative business model by asking airline travelers what they wanted. If that had been the way to get ideas, American and Delta would have been much better at it, since they have millions of captive customers. Southwest created their business model by listening to non-airline-travelers.

To read the full article, click here...
To read the ePaper, visit: http://emagazine.managementnext.com

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Warren Buffett’s ‘Moat’

Buffett’s annual letters have been a treat to its readers. It is replete with anecdotes, wit and lines from country music. Perhaps the best is in this line which announces his successors: “I reluctantly discarded the notion of my continuing to manage the portfolio after my death – abandoning my hope to give new meaning to the term “thinking outside the box.”

A truly great business must have an enduring “moat” (a metaphor for the superiorities some companies possess that make life difficult for their competitors) that protects excellent returns on invested capital. The dynamics of capitalism guarantee that competitors will repeatedly assault any business “castle” that is earning high returns. Therefore, a formidable barrier such as a company’s being the low cost producer (GEICO, Costco) or possessing a powerful world-wide brand (Coca-Cola, Gillette,American Express) is essential for sustained success. Business history is filled with “Roman Candles,” companies whose moats proved illusory but were soon crossed.

Our criterion of “enduring” causes us to rule out industrial companies prone to rapid and continuous change. Though capitalism’s “creative destruction” is highly beneficial for society, it precludes investment certainty. A moat that must be continuously rebuilt will eventually be no moat at all.

Additionally, this criterion eliminates the business whose success depends on having a great manager. Of course, a terrific CEO is a huge asset for any enterprise, and at Berkshire we have an abundance of these managers. Their abilities have created billions of dollars of value that would never have materialized,if typical CEO's had been running their businesses.

But if a business requires a superstar to produce great results, the business itself cannot be deemed great. A medical partnership led by your area’s premier brain surgeon may enjoy out sized and growing earnings, but that tells little about its future. The partnership’s moat will go when the surgeon goes. You can count, though, on the moat of the Mayo Clinic to endure, even though you can’t name its CEO.

The worst sort of business is one that grows rapidly, requires significant capital to engender the growth, and then earns little or no money. Think airlines. I should emphasize that we do not measure the progress of our investments by what their market prices do during any given year. Rather, we evaluate their performance by the two methods we apply to the businesses we own. The first test is improvement in earnings, with our making due allowance for industry conditions. The second test, more subjective, is whether their moats have widened during the year.

To read the full article, click here...
TO read the ePaper, visit: http://emagazine.managementnext.com

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Innovation first, strategy next

On March 19th, at an evening full of innovators and top honchos of the business community, the Marico “Innovation for India” awards were announced. Erehwon, along with the Marico Innovation Foundation had recognized the Tata Nano as the “Global Game Changer”. Speaking at the event, Dr. Mashelkar, had recommended an Innovation day to be announced for India and it could be the date of the Tata Nano launch at the January Auto Expo, and Why Not? For Indian entities to stand up and get noticed, Innovating is the only way and innovating of the kinds Nano did. Innovation must do for India what quality did for Japan.

It’s time we stop romancing with incrementalism and low end ‘jugaad’ innovations. It’s time companies/entities and their leaders display intellectual and emotional courage to innovation challenges not attempted before. Therein lies the secret of liberating Indian aspirations and dormant talent, not only for the good of the business but also for the good of the society.

Innovating is a must for all entities. Businesses need to innovate to redefine growth and value creation Models, governance need to innovate to carve out relevant and impactful policies, social groups need to innovate to fundamentally redefine the ‘Quality of Life’ for the citizens. We have seen too many painful and pedestrian ideas floating around yielding almost nil value. Mumbai still doesn’t have an answer to Mithi river debacle. Bangalore can’t find innovative ideas to overcome its crumbling infrastructure and Delhi’s courageous stance of cleaning up illegal structures have reclined back to dark ages. Someone is just not aware of the power of Innovation.

Positioning Innovation: Like many other things, Innovation in most companies is subservient to strategy and that position itself is a killer to the liberating power of Innovation. There needs to be a pre-strategy process. If Innovation is what creates great strategies, then one could look forward to a very high consistency and quality of breakthroughs in that company. Very often, when companies look for Innovation to fulfill strategy, game changing ideas are orphaned leading to variety of misnomers.

a) These kinds of things happen once a decade.
b) The markets are not ready for the break through Innovation.
c) We have to be smart; we cannot do things that don’t fit strategic directions, etc.

To read the full article, click here...
To read the ePaper, visit: http://emagazine.managementnext.com

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Inverter for the poor

The number of entrepreneurs getting bitten by the bottom-of-the pyramid bug is growing by the day. The latest to join the bitten list is the 40-year old Kunwer Sachdev who is planning to launch a Rs. 1,000/- inverter next year.With this he hopes to open up a latent market which is currently managing with emergency lamps and noisy generators in the urban areas and lanterns in villages.

The initial cost to the consumer will include a battery which could be priced at around Rs. 1,500/- Even at Rs. 2,500/- initial investment, the low-cost inverter, Sachdev believes, will be a hit among small shops, which run into a few million in India. With only fi ve percent of urban households having access to generator back-up, Sachdev believes the demand for this inverter will be tremendous. With the capacity to light up two CFL lamps for 48 hours, this inverter can be a boon in remote areas where power supply is erratic.

With the new offering of Sachdev’s Su-Kam Ltd, a 1,200 people, Rs.600-crore power back-up company, may again compete for the ‘Innovator for India’ award of Marico Foundation next year. This year the company won the award for business model innovation – for taking the unorganized power back-up industry from the paradigm of noisy diesel gensets to clean, green, efficient products and solutions that provide self-sufficiency to industrial users and home users alike.

To read the full article, click here...
To read the ePaper, visit: http://emagazine.managementnext.com

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

The Age of the Unreasonable

If you expect governments to solve the world’s big problems you must be kidding. Big businesses, after years of following Milton Friedman’s advice of pure capitalism, are only now talking of benign capitalism. Bill Gates calls it ‘Creative Capitalism’.Yet, big problems such as global poverty, diseases, basic education and funding for running simple businesses,persist in good measure.

Only a few ‘Unreasonable’ people – those who go out to solve problems with unorthodox methods– can bring sanity to the Planet. The Power of Unreasonable People: How Social Entrepreneurs Create Markets that Change the World, just out of the Harvard Press (Feb.08), John Elkington and Pamela Hartigan, capture the lives of a few brave people who are making a big difference.

Revealing the intriguing mindsets and winning strategies of some of the world’s most unconventional entrepreneurs, the book shows how these pioneers are solving some of the world’s most Pressing economic, social, and environmental problems - and in the process are creating fast-growing markets across the globe.

“Doing well by doing good”, a controversial idea only five years ago, has now become conventional wisdom. The Power of Unreasonable People illustrates how businesses and non-profits can generate social return on their investments.

To read the full article, click here...
To read the ePaper, visit: http://emagazine.managementnext.com

Labels: , , , , , ,